Wednesday, March 7, 2007

Ten Secrets Banks Don't Want You to Know About Credit Cards

Don't you just love it?! More tricks by the Credit Card companies you need to know about.

Ten Secrets Banks Don't Want You to Know About Credit Cards

  • Interest Backdating Most card issuers charge interest from the day a charge is posted to your account if you don't pay in full monthly. But, some charge interest from the date of purchase, days before they have even paid the store on your behalf!


    Remedy: Find another card issuer, or always pay your bill in full by the due date.


  • Two-Cycle Billing: Issuers using this method of calculating interest charge two months’ worth of interest for the first month you failed to pay off your total balance in full. This issue arises only when you switch from paying in full to carrying a balance from month to month.


    Remedy: Switch issuers or always pay your balance in full.


  • The Right to Setoff: If you have money on deposit at a bank and also have your credit card there, you may have signed an agreement when you opened the deposit account that permits the bank to take those funds if you become delinquent on your credit card.


    Remedy: Bank at separate institutions, or avoid delinquencies.


  • Fees Are Negotiable: You may be paying up to $50 a year or more as an annual fee on your credit card. You may also be subject to finance charges of more than 18 percent.


    Remedy: If you are a good customer, ask the bank to drop the annual fee and reduce the interest rate. Otherwise, you can switch issuers to a lower-priced card.


  • Interest Rate Hikes Are Retroactive: If you sign up for a credit card with a low "teaser" rate, such as 7.9 percent, when the low rate period expires, your existing balance will likely be subject to the regular and substantially higher interest rate.


    Remedy: Pay in full before the rate increase or close the account.


  • Shortened Due Dates: Most card issuers offer a 25-day grace period in which to pay for new purchases without incurring finance charges. Some banks have shortened the grace period to 20 days -- but only for customers who pay in full monthly.


    Remedy: Ask to go back to 25 days.


  • Eliminating Grace Periods: That fabulous offer you received in the mail for a gold card with a $10,000 credit limit and lots of features may not be so great. The most common "string" attached is the card has no grace period. You are charged interest on everything from the day you buy it, even if you pay on time.


    Remedy: Throw the offer out!


  • Disappearing Benefits: Many banks entice you to sign up with extra benefits such as lifetime warranty, a 5 percent discount on all travel or protection if an item purchased is lost. Now, some banks have cut back on these extras without the fanfare that launched them.


    Remedy: Read annual disclosure of changes, and switch cards if need be.


  • Double Fees on Cash Advances: Most credit cards impose both finance charges and a transaction fee on cash advances. Interest starts from the day of the advance, and the transaction fee can be up to 2.5 percent of the amount taken. Beware of cards advertising "no finance charges." Transaction fees may still apply.


    Remedy: Limit cash advances.


  • Misleading Monthly Minimums: You may think it is beneficial to have a card where you only need to pay 2 percent to 3 percent of your balance monthly. It is just the opposite. The bank stands to make far more money from finance charges the longer you carry out payments -- and you foot the bill.


    Remedy: Pay all you can monthly.

Congress Investigates Credit Card Interest Rate Abuses

Congress is investigating the imcomprehensible language in credit card agreements that address the interest rates to be charged. Here is the latest salvo.

Panel slams banks over credit practices

By MARCY GORDON, AP Business Writer 1 hour, 42 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - An Ohio man whose $3,200 credit card debt mushroomed to $10,700 with interest and fees told his story Wednesday to senators who denounced the industry for confusing billing practices and shifting interest rates.

Executives of three major banks defended their credit card practices as responsible and responsive to consumers' needs in testimony at the hearing of the Senate

Homeland Security
" name="c1" type="hidden"> SEARCH
News | News Photos | Images | Web

" name="c3" type="hidden">

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs' investigative subcommittee. Those from Citigroup Inc. and Chase Bank USA said their companies were eliminating some practices — including the one that hit Wesley Wannemacher of Lima, Ohio, with over-limit fees on his Chase card account 47 times although he went over his credit limit only three times.

The interest charges and fees on Wannemacher's account more than tripled his debt despite his having made payments averaging $1,000 a year over six years, noted Sen. Carl Levin (news, bio, voting record), D-Mich., the subcommittee's chairman.

"Unfair? Clearly, I think," Levin said. He said an investigation by the panel found that "sky-high interest charges and fees are not uncommon in the credit card industry. While the Wannemacher account happened to be at Chase, penalty interest rates and fees are also employed by Bank of America, Citigroup and other major credit card issuers."

Richard Srednicki, the chief executive officer of Chase Card Services, apologized to Wannemacher in his testimony. "In this case, we simply blew it," he said.

Srednicki said the company has decided it no longer will charge over-the-credit-limit fees to customers who have been in a chronic over-limit position for 90 days.

Wannemacher used a new Chase card in 2001 and 2002 to pay for expenses mostly related to his wedding. He had $3,200 in purchases, interest charges of $4,900, 47 over-limit charges totaling $1,500, late fees of $1,100, for total charges of $10,700 as of February. He paid $6,300, leaving a $4,400 balance — which Chase agreed to waive after he contacted the subcommittee staff.

"Debt seems to invoke a feeling of hopelessness unlike any other problem I've encountered," Wannemacher testified at the hearing. "When a debtor calls you on the phone and you make a minimum payment, you know that you've made no real progress and that in a month, they will be calling again."

Sen. Norm Coleman (news, bio, voting record) of Minnesota, the panel's senior Republican, said high interest rates on credit cards, "hefty fees and crippling penalties impede more and more hard-working families from pursuing their American dream."

The problem is worsened by the "impenetrable" language of credit card disclosures provided to consumers, he said.

While the credit card practices in question are legal, Levin is threatening possible legislation to outlaw them as a spur to the banking industry for voluntary changes.

Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (news, bio, voting record) and other Democratic senators challenged credit card executives at a hearing in January over rising late fees and other penalties and marketing practices they portrayed as predatory. Dodd, D-Conn., said he was putting the industry on notice that if it doesn't improve practices on its own, legislation may be warranted.

Since Democrats assumed control of Congress in January, they have put a number of consumer issues on the legislative agenda. With Americans weighed down by some $850 billion in consumer debt, the practices of the robustly profitable credit card industry are a compelling subject for scrutiny.

Citigroup, the nation's largest financial institution, announced last week that it was eliminating the practice of so-called universal default — raising interest rates for card customers because of their failure to pay other creditors on time. In addition, Citigroup said it would eliminate some types of interest rate increases that have been criticized.

Credit card issuers raise customers' rates and fees, for example, when they believe it is warranted by conditions in the financial markets. But under Citigroup's new policy, rates and fees will be increased before a card expires only if the customer pays late, exceeds his credit limit or pays with a check that bounces. Or if the rate is linked to the prime interest rate, it would rise or fall in tandem.